Objective
| Topology | SCIM |
|---|---|
| Models | Permeance / mmf electromagnetic model EM1.SCIM |
| Outputs | Radial airgap flux |
| Geometry | Skew |
| See also | ALG_014: same for SPMSM |
Machine
The machine is the one from the tutorial: machine_SCIM_A
- Squirrel Cage Induction Machine (railway application)
Results
This validation case compares the radial airgap flux computed by the 3 magnetic models of MANATEE (permeance/mmf, subdomain, FEMM) for skewed machines for the 2 skew computation methods:
- type_skew=1: average flux along the axial direction
- type_skew=2: full 3D flux density
3 machines are used, one with no skew, one with a skewed stator and one with a skewed rotor.
- type_skew = 1 validation
- type_skew = 2 validation
One can see that the three methods are consistent. Subdomain modeling technique is recommended as it captures both radial & tangential flux components.
